Great Egret, Huntington Beach State Park

I may have commented before how easy it is to set an increasingly high standard in photography, especially of birds.  The slippery slope seems to have these stages:

  • Being thrilled with a shot in which a bird can be identified
  • Hoping for a sharp, properly exposed shot
  • Being unsatisfied with anything less than a sharp, properly exposed, bird-in-action shot

Every once in a while, it does all come together.  Just not very often . . .

Head and curving neck of great egret with fish in beak

 

4 Comments

    1. Isabel Gibson

      Laurna – Thank you. He/she was just fishing relentlessly. There was no gap between swallowing each catch and watching for the next one. I wonder if they eat as long as there’s light.

  1. John Whitman

    My easy solution – take the shot and hope for the best. Maybe that equates to no standard at all, or maybe it is why I prefer taking pictures of landscapes.

    1. Isabel Gibson

      John – Gordon Sullivan, US Army Gen (ret’d) titled his book, “Hope is not a method.” I think of that sometimes when I just take the shot, in photography as in other pursuits. But in defence of hobbies (among other more serious thoughts), G.K. Chesterton said, “If a thing is worth doing, it is worth doing badly.” So we are both excused our poor results (when poor they be) as long as we are doing things we love.

Comments are closed.