Bring ’em On

Appreciate any feedback/comments.

I look at the email’s closing line and tilt my head a tad to the left, squinting. In context — a colleague circulating an initial draft for team review — and considering the understated source, I expect it’s an ellipsis.

ellipsis, noun:
the omission from speech or writing
of a word or words that are superfluous
or able to be understood from contextual clues
– Oxford Dictionary

We use ellipses a lot in speech, omitting those aforementioned super-fluous words (Retaining only the normally fluous words? Who *is* in charge of this language?) entirely naturally along these well-worn lines.

Start when (you are) ready.
We scored three goals; they scored two (goals).
I ordered the lobster, (I did) not (order) the linguini.

Now in this situation I don’t just expect it’s an ellipsis: I know it is. I know exactly what the author meant, and so do you.

(I’d) appreciate any feedback/comments
(you have on the attached document).

He was not, for example, likely soliciting the response I gave after another email asking for “any comments”:

I like penguins.

But for one glorious moment, I read it not as a mundane request for a standard professional courtesy (nor even as an opportunity to be silly) but as life advice, along these well-worn lines.

Seize the day.
Be in the moment.
Think before you speak.
Buy low; sell high.

OK, maybe not that last one, but you get the drift.

Appreciate any feedback/comments.

Yes.  Any negative/destructive ones remind us that our worth does not depend on what others think of us, and even less on what they say of us; any positive/constructive ones help us glow and grow.

Posted in Language and Communication, Laughing Frequently, Thinking Broadly | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

However Unfortunately

SpaceX’s Starship SN10 became the first Starship prototype
to successfully lift off, flip itself, and land.
The vessel, however, exploded shortly after landing.
Space

I get it, I really do. Earlier versions crashed, well, earlier. Like, say, before flipping. Or before landing, as opposed to after.

Starship SN10 landed in one piece!
Elon Musk

Yes, the same Elon Musk whose after-action report on the SpaceX starship that became a fireball on landing was that “the ascent phase was a success.”

Continue reading

Posted in Laughing Frequently, Thinking Broadly | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Zombie Crow-pocalypse

Seven, eight? No, 10. That’s how many crows I think I counted in the flurry of iridescent blackness as they lifted off from the squintingly white  snowdrifts in the backyard.

This murder had been gathered under the slowly rusting feeder, which stands atilt in the aforementioned snowdrift. If you wonder how heavy birds are — even big birds — the answer is, “Not very.” After all, they walk on flaky water. Even allowing for the design of their feet — sort of built-in snowshoes — I’m always surprised that they don’t sink into the snow.

Continue reading

Posted in Appreciating Deeply, Laughing Frequently | Tagged , | Leave a comment

On a Happier Note

Whew. That was a week, eh? Government malaise, potential military malaise, a cri de couer from an Asian American, and another look at positions on MAiD.

As we complete February, let’s end on a happier note. Three, in fact.

Continue reading

Posted in Appreciating Deeply, Photos of Built Stuff, Photos of Fauna, Photos of Landscapes | Tagged , , | 11 Comments

MAiD: And Again

This week brought an impassioned argument against expanding access to MAiD, and a dispassionate analysis of where we’re at and how we got here.

I find that I learn something from every commentator, but am reinforced in my belief that individual op-eds are only one component of public-policy debates. Each writer expounds their own opinion with a view to convincing the reader, but there is no conversation: no actual debate. We would benefit from having more venues where people who hold strong viewpoints can both express their views and respond to challenges to them.

This is a complex issue and positions tend to be a muddle of many components:

  • Strongly held beliefs (some religiously based but not all) on the value of life and the right to personal autonomy
  • Political beliefs on the role of the state (at all and specifically in medical decisions) and the courts
  • Legal views on the appropriate scope of criminal law
  • Opinions about the medical possibility and what we might call the “cost practicality” of managing pain, both physical and mental
  • The trade-offs involved in spending money in one healthcare area versus another
  • Emotional reactions to experiences of intolerable pain, whether one’s own or that of a loved one

Mix in the different angles of how MAiD provisions can/might affect the elderly (with varying degrees of mental competence), the mentally ill, the disabled, those with terminal illness or incurable degenerative conditions, minors, and people who live in small or remote communities, and it’s amazing we can talk about it at all without coming to blows.

Anyway, first the analysis, then the passion. Both articles are worth reading in full if you have access to the National Post site. If not, the excerpts below will give you an idea of the range of commentary and approaches.

Continue reading

Posted in Feeling Clearly, Politics and Policy, Thinking Broadly | Tagged , | 4 Comments

R-O-E Redux

I recommend this article as a follow-on to thinking about rules of engagement: This time, at the cultural/societal level.

With the rise of Asian American hate crimes,
I’m no longer confused about who I am.
I am Asian, as well as American,
and swallowing the bitterness of racism
shouldn’t be something that I have to bear.
America and Americans should do better.
Kathleen Hou, Swallowing our Bitterness

Posted in Feeling Clearly, Relationships and Behaviour | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Waiting for It

Sigh. The acronym I most wanted to learn this year was not CFNIS, which stands for Canadian Forces National Investigation Services, the investigative arm of the Canadian Forces Military Police.

The CFNIS was established in 1997 with a mandate to investigate serious and sensitive matters related to Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces. It performs a function similar to that of a Major Crime unit of the RCMP or large municipal/provincial police agency.- Wikipedia

It’s early days in the investigation into sexual misconduct by Canada’s top soldier — this one, a sailor just two months into the job of Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS) — but it’s a bad look for the military, coming hard on the heels of an investigation into sexual misconduct by Canada’s former top soldier.

Open up a can of CDS, Martha.
We’re gonna need another one.

Continue reading

Posted in Feeling Clearly, Management and Work, Relationships and Behaviour, Thinking Broadly | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Seriously?

The Parliamentary Budget Officer released a report
on the navy’s next-generation warship program on Wednesday … and you’ve all stopped reading already, haven’t you? Hello?
Matt Gurney, National Post

Of all the boring topics in government, and there are many, procurement must surely be near the top: The most boring, I mean.

No one would blame you if you had [stopped reading].
Because you’ve read how many stories like this before?
Under how many governments, going back how many years?

Continue reading

Posted in Politics and Policy, Thinking Broadly | Tagged | 11 Comments

Rules of Engagement (ROE)

Welcome to our monthly church meeting.
Before we begin, let’s review our R-O-E.
We treat everyone as if we believed
they, too, have a spark of divinity.
We assume good intentions, even or especially
in those with whom we disagree on methods or priorities.
We are grateful for this opportunity
to work in community, even when it’s frustratingly slow.

Said no church-committee chairperson ever.

Continue reading

Posted in Management and Work, New Perspectives, Politics and Policy, Relationships and Behaviour, Thinking Broadly | Tagged , , | 19 Comments